Smart meter showdown in Hope


This homemade bomb, apparently made with jet fuel, was confiscated by RCMP from a home in Hope Feb. 28. Here’s the full report from the Hope detachment.

File #2013-6338

Home-made device makes electrical dispute explosive!

Hope, BC: On February 28, 2013, around 1:00 PM, the Hope RCMP and the Upper Fraser Valley Regional Detachment RCMP First Nations Police were called to assist BC Hydro in keeping the peace at a home in the 21900 block of Ross Road.
BC Hydro employees advised that the occupants of the residence were using an illegal meter that had been installed without authorization. After repeated threats of violence towards BC Hydro employees, the utility requested a police escort to the residence to inspect their equipment and install an authorized BC Hydro meter.

Upon arrival, the couple refused to allow BC Hydro access to inspect their equipment. BC Hydro had safety concerns about the couple’s current meter setup as they allegedly removed their original meter and replaced it with an unauthorized meter from an abandoned house nearby. The couple was advised that if they didn’t allow the inspection, BC Hydro would be forced to cut power to the residence.

During conversation with the couple, the man allegedly made indirect threats to officers and BC Hydro employees that if a new meter was installed people could lose their lives and police may have to kill him. The woman became agitated during the incident and was arrested after allegedly threatening to hit and punch the Hope officer. While the officer was escorting the woman to his police car, the woman allegedly assaulted the Hope officer by kicking him.

During the arrest of the female, the man went into his residence and came out with two mason jars containing a blue clear liquid. He was holding an ignitor that was rigged to the jars in one of his hands. The members believed this to be a home-made bomb. Police negotiated with the man who eventually unarmed himself and was subsequently arrested.

“This is an example that shows there is never a routine call for a police officer,” says Staff Sergeant Suki Manj. “Two seasoned officers were faced with a life and death situation and were almost forced to use lethal force to protect themselves and the public.”
“You never know what a person is willing to do over something that may seem trivial to others,” says Staff Sergeant Suki Manj. “In this case, we are glad we were able to resolve this situation without anyone been seriously injured.”

The RCMP Explosive Disposal Unit (EDU) attended and determined the content of the mason jars was likely jet fuel which was triggered with a BBQ ignitor. The suspected bomb was destroyed at the scene by EDU.

Dean Grykuliak, 46 years old from Hope, has been charged with possessing a weapon for dangerous purpose and two counts of conveying a threat against the two officers. Ella Gutierrez, 48 years old from Hope, has been charged with assaulting a peace officer.

Another day, another unbelievable anonymous e-mail from the anonymous puzzle factory that calls itself “stopsmartmetersbc”.

Third-hand advice from an unnamed police chief? This mysterious crime-fighter allows he has members of Team Tinfoil on the force, and he supposedly offered legal advice that BC Hydro installers aren’t entitled to go on properties displaying signs refusing wireless upgrades.

Here’s the whole blithering mess, minus the lurid coloured type, including reference to an irrelevant court decision from Colorado.

From: stopsmartmetersbc
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 5:12 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: (stopsmartmetersbc.ca) update Jan. 22

1) Very important information obtained by a member via a conversation with a chief of police, who has not yet agreed to allow me to give his name. I suggest we all ask our police chiefs how they would respond, and if they agree with this chief:

“I just had a meeting with the Chief of Police in _______ and outlined the current situation with regards to Hydro trespass issues. He was not only aware of the situation but was well informed since several of his police officers and staff were also opponents of the program and had sent in non-consent forms and posted no trespass signage at their homes. Below is what he clearly stated as the position of the Police.

“Hydro has every right to access a customer’s property to read the meter.

“Hydro has no authority to enter any property with the intention of changing a meter to a Smeter if the homeowner has clearly identified their position with signage (do not install and non consent) and under no circumstance would Hydro be entitled to access (for the purpose of installation) if ‘no trespass’ notice specifically outlined the homeowners right of refusal and notice of trespass identifying Hydro or its contractors.

“He advised that any trespass issues by Hydro would be a violation of a citizen’s rights and would be considered to be an unlawful act and that the Police should be contacted immediately. Bravo!

When I asked him about making a citizens arrest and hog tying the perpetrator he recommended not.”

2) Please submit comments, and write to Micheal Vonn at the BC Civil Liberties Association at micheal@bccla.org They could help us in this battle for our rights.

BC Hydro moves to install remainder of smart meters – Customers must comply since opponents lost legal challenge by Bruce Constantineau – The Vancouver Sun – January 22, 2013:

http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Hydro+moves+install+remainder+smart+meters/7856805/story.html

3) Some people are reporting that Corix/Hydro is coming with or saying they will bring the police to force installation. Refusing to allow a meter is not a criminal offense and unless there is any threat of or attempt at aggression, the police should not get involved.

4) In Colorado, a judge has refused to allow extra fees to be charged to those opting out of the “dumb” grid program. Also, please notice the costs that are triple budget for the first 100 homes. In many places, as I expect will happen in BC (if it hasn’t already), costs are double and triple those initially projected. In Hydro’s business plan there was nothing, for example, for increased security of our data and, probably, inadequate costs for storage and maintenance of the huge amount of data that will be gathered. This, again, is typical. http://www.chieftain.com/business/judge-rejects-smartgrid-surcharge/article_0741a884-61ea-11e2-8917-001a4bcf887a.html?goback=%2Egde_3188262_member_206115802

So when the NDP says that nothing can be done because the money has been spent, please remind them that only the first installment has been spent. Much more is yet to come.

5) CTV report: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1esqtznbr4

Many erroneous statements by Cindy “For Sure” about the grid and program that need to be corrected. These devices are not part of the distribution system and will in no way help. They are merely replacing meters that measure usage. The same old powerlines, poles and transformers are distributing power and will continue to fail.

The program CAN work with analogs at homes. Opt outs are allowed and accommodated in programs around the world. Hydro’s program is costing 2-3 times more per meter than anywhere else yet it cannot handle opt out???
Hydro reps are “talking” and “informing”. Not bullying, threatening, harassing??

There are more than 140,000 homes, not 85,000 as reported. Hydro itself gave this figure in reports last week.

6) Article submitted by someone living in Ireland about radiating devices, whether meters or TETRA masts, which Hydro is using. Many good points, one of which is that Dr. William Bailey, of Exponent, a known “product defense company” has been hired by Fortis. Isn’t it odd that such a company known to fight for some of the most unethical products, has been employed by Fortis if these wireless measuring devices are so wonderful?

http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/letters-to-the-editor/one-readers-smart-meter-experience-in-ireland-1513.html

I have obtained another e-mail from one of B.C.’s leading anti-smart meter organizations. Carefully anonymous, it reaches new heights of hysteria and irresponsible scare tactics, making an earlier rallying cry from Salt Spring Island seem calm by comparison.

Fabricating claims of BC Hydro “storm trooper tactics” and then suggesting people call 9-1-1 isn’t really very smart, but that’s what people on Vancouver Island and elsewhere are being advised.

As usual, there is plenty of inadvertent humour. The harrowing tale of e-mail bounce-backs and unanswered phone calls leads to a touching devotion to the good old technology of sending faxes to politicians. Yes sir, this jihad against “EMF smog,” as some refer to wireless signals, is on the bleeding edge of the 21st Century battlespace.

And of course they suggest recording cell-phone videos of any “bullying” to use as evidence of the evil wireless threat. (I almost don’t have the heart to remind them that their phones are a stronger source than their meters.)

At the end is a heart-felt shout-out to Province columnist Mike “Smythe” that shouldn’t be missed. Here’s the whole incredible screed:

From: stopsmartmetersbc
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:53 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: (stopsmartmetersbc.ca) Jan 18

Port Hardy has 4 Corix white pickup trucks and 2 small Corix trucks; So here we go. We have to survive 12 weeks until election. Please spread this info all over the province please.
1) This is what is happening – Corix comes first – then when owner turns Corix away, if they comply – the BC Hydro guys are showing up at the door next, even within 30 minutes. Two of them together.

When Corix Hydro guys show up, you have to get their names and badge/id numbers – there appears to be grounds for harassment lawsuits but people need details of the individuals to press harassment lawsuits. They do everything to draw the person into conversation – DON’T TALK TO THEM.

TURN THEM AWAY and state all communication must be in writing. They will keep insisting, but the door has to be closed on them. They will keep talking and keep referring to further contact. People have to say – communicate with me only in writing. DON’T THREATEN THEM, just be unmovable.

RECORD ANYTHING THEY SAY, IF YOU CAN. BULLIES DON’T LIKE TO BE RECORDED.

IF YOU FEEL THREATENED, CALL 911. Call your area contacts, neighbours. Help others to stand firm, too.
2) We should be calling the Premier, Rich Coleman, MLAs, etc. and encouraging others to do so – complaining about the tactics being used and the fear that is being generated by BC Hydro’s and Corix’s storm trooper tactics. Anger and outrage should be expressed, in a quiet way, so that we don’t sound hysterical, but people are being threatened, police called, etc.
a. Office of the Premier and Cabinet Office: – http://canadaonline.about.com/od/premiers/a/writepremierbc.htm

[PHONE NUMBERS REDACTED]

Mailing Address:
The Honourable Christy Clark
Premier of British Columbia, Box 9041, Station PROV GOVT, Victoria, BC  Canada  V8W 9E1
b. MLA Finder – Legislative Assembly of BC:

http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/3-1-1.htm

c. BC Government Service, BC Enquiry:
- https://extranet.gov.bc.ca/forms/gov/contact/index.html

General enquiries
Can’t find what you are looking for?  Have a question about a program or service?
Contact us Monday through Friday, 7:30am to 5pm Pacific Time.

[PHONE NUMBERS REDACTED]

d. BC Government Directory:
- http://dir.gov.bc.ca/

3)  People who have phoned have not had much success. Some have been told they must write to the Premier, MLA, and BC Hydro.  As well, there must be real evidence of harassment, intimidation, and bullying.  Video with camera or phone.

4)  Some additional information of how to successfully get through to government officials and, in particular, the Premier’s office:

After hearing lots lately about bounced-back or undelivered emails and refused registered or regular letters to BC Hydro in particular (and other politicians), along with all the phone-calls that go nowhere …

There are only 2 sure ways to know for sure that a document, correspondence or message has been received.

1. FAX
A fax machine gives you a sent/received receipt, and there is no denying it. That is your proof. Let’s get those Fax machines humming all day, every day on this issue. Faxes are treated on a whole different level, apparently, perhaps due to the trackable nature.

PREMIER CLARK: FAX NUMBER  (REDACTED)

See 2) b. above (MLA Finder – Legislative Assembly of BC)  to search for politicians’ FAX numbers.  If you can’t find it, call their office and ask for it. They should not ask why you want it but if they do, tell them you are sending in a support letter. They love that.

2. COURIER
Send documentation by courier. Your letter gets put into a general courier pack/envelope and there will be no indication on the outside what it is, so it won’t get refused and will get signed for. The courier company keeps records of receipt and online tracking systems will show receipt info too.

Remember that only a very tiny handful of the current political officials will still be around come May, so our efforts should be directed loudly at Michael Smythe, Provincial Legislative reporter.  Apparently, ALL politicians hang on to every word of Michael Smythe and read his editorials VORACIOUSLY, DAILY and have been doing so for years.

Here’s celebrity environmentalist Tzeporah Berman, in her latest role with Greenpeace International where she is enthusiastically campaigning against the evil “Tarsands” as she calls them. She’s got 3,350 Facebook friends, one less since she unfriended me yesterday.

I got into an argument with her and some of her friends after she posted this dramatic photo from U.S. environmental group 350.org and its exhortation to join another march on Washington D.C. against the Keystone XL pipeline.

Regular readers will know I have questioned the single-minded focus of U.S.-funded environmental groups, such as Berman’s various employers, on the Alberta oilsands. I am regularly accused of being a tool of the oil industry or the Harper government, but that’s not really my motivation. I am simply a journalist with a few years’ experience in the petroleum industry and a basic knowledge of chemistry and mathematics. That’s not much of a knowledge base, but it’s enough to see through the systematic misrepresentation of greenhouse gas and conventional pollution impacts from this chosen villain of the environmental movement and its celebrity supporters.

The New York Times quote above refers to a study by Canadian government scientists released on Monday. Here’s a Globe and Mail report on the same study.

The pollution impact of this vast industrial project sounds pretty dramatic. But note the final paragraph of the Globe story, which refers to the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in remote Alberta lakebeds:

PAH levels in all six tested lakes were found to have increased, though only in one are contaminants at urban-lake levels. In that lake, seven of 13 PAHs tested are at a level considered to have the potential for “possible” but not “probable” impact. The other five are “generally comparable to other remote lakes and much lower than” urban lakes, the study concludes.

What this means is that PAH contamination is a product of all fossil fuel use, from extraction to refining to the most significant activity, burning gasoline and diesel in vehicles. That’s why Burnaby Lake has more contamination than a lake near the Athabasca oilsands.

I pointed this out on Berman’s Facebook page, and a lively discussion ensued. A friend of hers began throwing out statistics that simply don’t add up, and Berman weighed in with similar claims. One of her favourite tricks is to drop out the pollution and CO2 impact of the fuel use, which accounts for nearly 70 per cent of the total “well to wheels” emissions. This makes oilsands extraction seem much worse than it actually is.

After I cited a Royal Society of Canada study to debunk her friend’s claim of vast, catastrophic greenhouse gas impact from oilsands development, and pointed out that vehicle emissions in Canada are more than five times the greenhouse gas emissions of the entire oilsands, Berman had had enough. She saw that I had accused her of intentionally misusing statistics to support the popular, donation-attracting, but wrong, idea that stopping Alberta oilsands production will save the planet.

If it was that simple, I’d be in favour of it too. But it’s not. As long as our society depends on oil and coal, other sources of these materials will simply fill the void and Canada’s economy will suffer without significant improvement of pollution or greenhouse gases. That’s a harsh reality, but it’s a reality nonetheless.

You can see the whole exchange here.

How frackin’ dumb do they think we are?

Here’s one of the lesser-known aboriginal blockades in northern B.C. targeting the Pacific Trails pipeline project to bring natural gas to Kitimat, for an LNG project partly owned by the Haisla Nation. While recognized governments of Canada, B.C. and First Nations have approved these projects, a splinter group has mounted a campaign with the help of professional protesters from Vancouver.

(Notice the term “decolonized” that is currently in vogue as Idle No More protests swell in cities, thanks in large measure to earnest but poorly informed non-native campus radicals.)

This week’s column on the U.S. influence in B.C. and Canada’s environmental movement has excited quite a bit of feedback. Regarding fossil fuels, it seems few people are aware of the international business agendas at work here. It’s fine I suppose if corporations want to compete for market share, but when they dress it up as environmentalism and conceal their own role using front groups such as Sierra Club, it doesn’t do much to instil confidence in these self-styled green warriors.

While the urban media cover the staged protests and relay the protesters’ talking points, here’s a look behind the curtain. This link describes how the United Arab Emirates government provided funding so the movie Promised Land could be made.

Here’s one from Vivian Krause documenting Rockefeller Brothers Fund’s “partnership income” from competing pipeline ventures in the U.S., flowed through to efforts by West Coast Environmental Law and Pembina Foundation to oppose the Enbridge project.

And here’s one where the executive director of the Sierra Club admits to accepting $26 million from Chesapeake Energy, one of the U.S.’s largest gas companies, to run a campaign against coal. Michael Brune gamely argues that this was before Sierra discovered the evils of fracking, and tries to make it sound like they refused the dirty gas money, but you’ll notice they didn’t give any of it back.

Some people protest out of well-researched belief. Some do it for the money, and many just follow the crowd.

More reinforcements for West Wing

The arrival of former CTV-CBC-CityTV anchorman Ben Chin to Premier Christy Clark’s office set off the usual round of “crumbling regime” stories here in the capital.

It’s been quite a ride since Clark took the helm from Gordon Campbell, whose long-time press secretary Mike Morton is back to hold the fort along with B.C. Liberal “issues management” stalwart Shane Mills. Chin arrives after mostly un-disastrous service as press wrangler to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty. He even showed his Liberal loyalty by standing in an Ontario by-election before relocating to Vernon.

So ends the era of Harper’s “SEAL Team 6,” as the Sto:lo poet Ernie Crey dubbed the arrival of former Harper press secretary Sara MacIntyre and equally short-lived chief of staff Ken Boessenkool. They were supposed to hit the beach, get Clark re-elected and secure the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, or so the theory went.

Sad to report that after Global TV took out MacIntyre in a classic hit piece, the Vancouver Sun decided to drag her body through the street, Mogadishu-style. The Sun’s eminent Vaughn Palmer retailed her plaintive e-mails, supplied by the NDP, in which she asked for a job description and length-of-stay expectations in the wake of her sudden transfer to a ministry communications shop.

Chin is a decent and capable fellow, with a wealth of experience that will come in handy keeping the divas of TV news happy. He can have no illusions about being called in to pitch the ninth inning in Clark’s bid for re-election, the fate of ex-CTVer Chris Olsen or the rest of the evolving communications strategy that has defined the Clark administration.

SEAL Team 6 parachutes out

Sara MacIntyre’s departure from Premier Christy Clark’s inner circle completes an unusual experiment in federal-provincial cooperation that didn’t turn out so well.

When MacIntyre and Ken Boessenkool arrived in Victoria in April, we quoted the Sto:lo sage Ernie Crey, who dubbed them “Harper’s SEAL Team 6.” Their mission, according to Crey: get Clark elected against the socialist hordes and get the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline through. MacIntyre came directly from Harper’s Ottawa office as press secretary, whereas Boessenkool took a more scenic route via government relations firm Hill and Knowlton, where he represented the likes of pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline and, er, Enbridge.

Boessenkool, the Mustang-driving, water skiing wunderkind from Calgary who once advised Stockwell Day and Preston Manning, departed suddenly as Clark’s chief of staff three weeks ago after an incident involving a female government staff member at a post-golf party at Victoria’s trendy Bard and Banker pub. Shortly after he left, Clark flew to Calgary to execute his strategy to meet with Alberta Premier Alison Redford over the pipeline.

This continues a premier’s office revolving door that included previous chief of staff Mike McDonald leaving to work for the BC Liberal Party to make room for Boessenkool, and two other staffers departing in recent weeks. Replacing MacIntyre as communications director is Clark’s faithful fireman Shane Mills, a former Black Press editor known for his B.C. Liberal war room efforts in the last couple of elections. Press secretary duties are now in the hands of Gordon Campbell’s long-time flack Mike Morton.

MacIntyre didn’t get much slack from the Vancouver media. After a bristly few days of limiting Clark’s access in the Harper style, she was featured in what MP James Moore would call a “hit piece” by Global TV.  She goes to a vacant position with Government Communications and Public Engagement, as the ministry information apparatus was renamed by Clark.

George Abbott, unplugged

Here’s George Abbott, researching primary school issues in a Penticton classroom as education minister. Political observers know his penchant for comedy, and will miss his wit in legislature debate.

(A personal favourite: rising to respond to NDP allegations of mishandled health care resources, Abbott accused the opposition of relying on “a leaked copy of the Vancouver Sun.”)

At yesterday’s news conference announcing his departure after 33 years in local and provincial politics, Abbott was in top form. Here are the highlights, starting with a reference to Kevin Falcon’s retirement announcement the day before:

First I want to put to rest the rumours that my wife and I are expecting another baby, and reconfirm that my child-bearing years are over. I’m prepared to move on and just entertain grandchildren at this point, rather than presenting more babies. I’ve done enough of that. Three times was more than enough.
• • •
The legislature has been my personal Hotel California. I was here in 1976 as a legislative intern, and as they say, you can check out but you can never leave.
• • •
I welcome any of the perplexing and embarrassing questions that you may have, provided they are not about asparagus (a reference to an earlier media scrum when Abbott volunteered details of its effect on his urine).
• • •
I had the opportunity to serve in opposition for five years. It did feel in many respects like the best 50 years of my life. I would not relish the thought of going back there. That having been said, whether I was continuing in cabinet or sitting in opposition, it’s really not a consideration for me at this point.
• • •
As Frank Sinatra once observed, regrets, I’ve had a few. But really not very many.
• • •
My elder son Brant is on the cusp of getting a PhD in economics from UBC, and I’m deeply jealous and envious of him. I do have a master’s degree in political science from the University of Victoria, and have been entertaining the thought of going back and doing a doctorate.
Someone reminded me, though, the other day that there is a hell of a lot of work involved in getting one. So right now, what I’m doing is putting out a plea for someone to provide me with an honorary doctorate, because then I can have all the prestige of describing myself as a doctor.
• • •
I do hope to be living here in Victoria. I’m too old to return to farming, and too young to die.

The accidental comedy of protesters

Whatever became of all-purpose Vancouver Island protester Ingmar Lee? Here’s the veteran tree-sitter during his star turn as a fringe candidate in the 2005 election, just before he busted up a televised election forum and got himself tackled and arrested at a Victoria hotel.

Ingmar has resurfaced in the central coast community of Shearwater, according to an inadvertently hilarious post on the “Common Sense Canadian,” the latest project of Rafe Mair (recently dumped from CBC radio) and his sidekick Damien Gillis, who seems to see himself as the Michael Moore of B.C.

Check the second audio clip to get an idea of how clueless Lee and Gillis are. Lee begins a typical diatribe at a federal hearing on the Enbridge proposal by describing his shame that Canada is run by an “oil lackey” who got elected with a “so-called majority.” He is quickly cut off and reminded that the hearings are not a platform for personal insults or political attacks. Gillis tries unsuccessfully to suggest that it is the panel that is behaving inappropriately.

And how about Ingmar’s direct action pal Zoe Blunt? She’s been up in northern B.C. at a protest camp that is trying to stop a natural gas pipeline. Here’s an installment of their protest video. It starts with a couple of guys driving their pickup truck from Vancouver, apparently unaware of the irony of depending on fossil fuels to organize a protest against fossil fuels.

Later, Blunt describes recruiting other self-righteous city protesters to interfere with gas pipeline infrastructure that has attracted no protest from legitimate aboriginal leaders in the region. In fact the Haisla Nation is a partner in one of the LNG projects that will export the gas carried by this pipeline.

With selective scenes of logging that Gillis would be proud of, the video leaves the impression of uncontrolled resource extraction. These days, it’s more and more likely to be aboriginal communities doing the logging in the region, but these protesters aren’t about to let the facts get in their way.

Kevin Krueger, unplugged

Since Kamloops-North Thompson MLA Kevin Krueger announced he won’t run for a fifth term next spring, there have been quite a few greatest hits collections, mostly selected shots at his political foes. Here’s a longer version of Krueger’s exit interview with members of the legislative press gallery this week.

On why he’s pulling the plug after what will be 17 years as MLA and occasional cabinet minister:

People have been asking me for 16 years if I was running again, and my answer was I’ll know when it’s time to stop. My wife and I have been back and forth on that question over the years. In 2004, one day I told her I decided I wasn’t running again as the 2005 election approached. You always want to leave people enough time to choose a new candidate if you aren’t going to. And up until then, she had been tremendously opposed to me being involved at all, right from the beginning.

And when I finally told her I was going to accede to her request, she said, ‘what are you talking about?’ She said, look at all the stuff you’re getting done. Who else can truthfully say that they caused a university to be created in in his home town, and she made a list.
And I got up on one elbow and said, ‘who’s this in my bed talking to me like that?’ because it was exactly the opposite of what I’d always heard.

The day John van Dongen did his thing [jumped to the B.C. Conservatives], of course I was asked, I think all of us were, if we were going to run again. And happily for me, she and I had just had a conversation a few days before … where she said, I really think you should run again.

The premier’s made it very clear, and I agree with her, that we need to bring in some new faces, more than maybe presently planned. We talked about cabinet, back at the time her decision was made, and I agreed with her that if you promise new faces in cabinet, and a smaller cabinet, the arithmetic’s not in favour of incumbents. And in my one-on-one interview with her, I told her I really thought Terry Lake should have a shot at it. Really bright guy, more educated than me … and that’s what she did.

On how he can return to his job as an ICBC manager after all that time:

I had a good career going before the fire in the belly made me put my name on a ballot. We all told each other at the time we should go two terms max. But then we had to blow the first term on five years as a visibly unhappy opposition. And so we didn’t feel that clock should start until 2001, when we became government. But I’m way past that.

And I’ve been on this long-term leave without pay from my job at ICBC, and they and I never expected it to go this long, but everyone’s very gracious about it. It is a contract, so they have repeatedly fulfilled the obligation to reassure me, and written to me and said that’s all valid. They’ve probably changed their management guide since, but it was a contract a the time.
I’ve just turned 57 years old, and I’m still a long way from retirement age. I’ve enjoyed my ICBC career and they have a place for me.

On death threats, and getting elected four times:

[Constituents] are really good to me. Nobody has any doubt, I don’t think, that I would have been re-elected again if I ran, and that’s not braggadocio. I don’t get much negative e-mail at all any more. At the beginning I got death threats. I had to go to an unlisted number at home because my children were still young and they were picking up the phone and getting death threats.

The RCMP were involved. They followed me around for a while, saying they were serious. That started the day it was known I was pursuing the nomination. Kamloops used to be a really tough town – not being partisan, this is the truth – from the NDP point of view. The day people found out that I was thinking about not being an ICBC manager any more but a candidate, I started seeing people give me the finger when I drove down the street. I started getting nasty phone calls, and there was a deluge of that once I was running and especially after we became government.

Gordon Campbell had to have RCMP protection right from the beginning, because the RCMP said the same thing to him, that these were serious death threats, and we’re going to be driving you around. I didn’t have to have that for very long, and for years now, I hardly get any harassment, and I never get death threats, which is a welcome change.

Lots of people have said to me, ‘No one would ever presume to take you on or force you out or anything like that.’ You’ve seen how supportive Premier Clark is. Because for the last while I felt as though I paid my dues and I should be able to speak about issues even if they’re controversial. I’ve done that, and I’ve been upbraided sometimes by some of you for that.

When I made my remarks about the judiciary I got considerable criticism from the press gallery, but then all through the following weekend, probably journalists were getting copies of e-mails from all over the province. There was a huge wave of support, completely unsolicited by me.

On speaking his mind, loudly:

When I was a kid growing up on a homestead, listening to my Dad – and he was an ex World War II soldier who went on the beach at D-Day – and all his friends, it was constantly, ‘Why in the world do these people we elect to tell Victoria and Ottawa what we think, always want to tell us what Victoria and Ottawa think? Why don’t they convey our message to government?’ And I felt an obligation to do that. Way too bluntly, initially. I think I’ve gotten a little better at that later. But people like it.
And I get waves of support whenever I take on something controversial. I try to ever say anything hurtful, certainly never things that are untrue. Some things are going to be hurtful, but, you know, I try to be decent about that. I’m a Christian first.

On whether Christy Clark can win the next election:

Oh yes. She will. I have no doubt that she will. If you guys could have been a fly on the wall at our caucus planning session at 108 [Mile House] a couple of weeks ago, the caucus is united. And she was chosen in a process that was fair and square. And it was a tough process….

In the B.C. Liberal government, since Gord asked me to be the liaison between the executive and caucus, that was one of the toughest times. We really felt we needed to make that constitutional change [equal weight for constituencies regardless of membership] so Surrey wouldn’t decide who was the leader every time. It was tough but we got it through, and Christy’s team was really smart. They went out and won support in a lot of the un-held ridings … and from there they still had to work hard, and she won. Mike McDonald is brilliant. Ken Boessenkool is a great choice.

On the B.C. Liberal government’s record:

We have – you really can’t argue with this – admirable results in many areas. It’s quite something to have a triple-A credit rating and the most jobs in B.C.’s history in the teeth of a world-wide recession. The Conference Board of Canada, year after year, says we have the best health care in the country. We’re told over and over we’ve got some of the best education results in the world.

On the impression that he and other MLAs are jumping from Christy Clark’s ship, and the legacy of the HST:

Nobody’s blaming her for that. There may well be others. I hope not too many more, because I think it’s important to have the experience there. For me it was really personal considerations. And one of them is, I was a champion of HST, and I still am. And every time I say that, it bugs people, because they didn’t like it. They mainly say they didn’t like it because of what they call the way they implemented it. And it’s been very painful for me for people to say that we lied, and specifically that I lied. I’ve volunteered repeatedly to take a polygraph, and I still would, because we didn’t lie.

Another criticism that I heard all my life … is that government can’t get anything done quickly. It just can’t rise to opportunity. It takes forever, and the situation has changed. And I was thrilled that my colleagues had the jam to make the decision. When we got that opportunity, it was unheard of. Nobody even bothered to asked me in the whole 2009 campaign what I thought of harmonizing, because they’d heard us deal with that so many times.

And I had pleaded with my colleagues to do it, because I was chairing the small business roundtable leading up to that election. And they consistently said to me – it wasn’t all, restaurants were never in favour, but they’re only about 20,000 out of at that time 380,000 small businesses in B.C., now it’s 400,000, with 1,050,000 employees between them, and as they point out to me, that’s less than three employees per small business average. Generally there’ a couple of partners, often spouses. And they’d say, one of the partners has to spend most of his or her time doing books for two levels of government and dealing with local government, and it just burns up too much time. We can’t grow our businesses properly.

And I’d make that pitch in caucus and in cabinet, but the response always was, no, we’re the tax cutting regime. We had cut taxes at that time more than 120 different times, different ways. And we’re not going to change that. The federal government has always insisted [the HST rate] will be 13 per cent, and five plus seven is 12, and we won’t do it.

Then it really was that first cabinet meeting after the election. [Then-finance minister] Colin Hansen very gingerly said to us, ‘you’re not going to want to hear this, we’ve debated it repeatedly, but I have to report to you the federal government has made us a new offer. And they’ll let us go at 12, and they’ve never conceded that before. They’ll give us five per cent exemptions, and we’ll probably have to burn that up mostly on home heating and vehicle fuels because we did carbon tax, and the public won’t accept that.’ He laid it all out to us and then he said, if we don’t do it, Ontario will be two years ahead of us because this is a two-year legislative cycle in Ottawa. We won’t get an other chance for two years. By then it will have been a huge temptation for investors to go there and create jobs instead of here. And the kicker is, they’ll give us $1.6 billion to be spent wherever we feel it’s most needed.

At that time, one person at the table said ‘what’s their phone number?’ It was almost too good to believe. Our deficit was was much larger than we thought, and I know people think we lied about that too. They think we have our fingers on the levers all through an election. But the convention is – and we followed it – you don’t interfere. You let the civil service run the government, and you only have a cabinet meeting if there was an earthquake or something serious. And that’s how we behaved ourselves. So it was news to us that the deficit was so much larger.

Gordon Campbell, a very smart man as you know, knew exactly how all of this was going to come across to the public. But we really believe it was the right thing to do. And I really believe to this day, if all of my constituents could have been watching us on video, and they were able to use those buzzers they use on TV to vote, it would have been a huge percentage, well over 90, that would essentially think that I was an idiot if I didn’t vote for it.

But of course they weren’t there. I thought once I explained that to everyone that they might agree HST was a good idea. But Vander Zalm outflanked us tremendously, and you all know how it happened. Now I think, of course, that we would have been way better off consulting for two years rather than fighting for two years and then losing. But I’m completely tied to that. My fingerprints are all over it.

I really would like somebody to give me a polygraph so I could prove I’ve never lied for a moment about the thing. And that hurts, but I’m not going away hurt. I think it’s better if I’m gone. People all say how loyal I am to the government and the premiers and so on, and that’s true, but I think Christy Clark deserves to run without me on the ticket, because I am so completely tied and very frankly so, to everything we did. My own constituents would vote for me, I’m confident, but people around the province would say, well, there you go. If that guy’s still there, then nothing has changed.